+124.5%
GLD vs TNA
+117.1%
+7.4%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TNA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -1.3% | -0.4% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +0.7% | +4.1% | -3.3% | +0.5% |
| 30D | +0.3% | -7.6% | +7.9% | +0.9% |
| 3M | +0.6% | +8.1% | -7.5% | 0.0% |
| 6M | -15.6% | +49.0% | -64.6% | -17.6% |
| YTD | +0.9% | +51.7% | -50.9% | -1.6% |
| 1Y | +19.4% | +59.6% | -40.2% | +16.1% |
| 3Y | +124.5% | +118.9% | +5.6% | +114.8% |
| All | +124.5% | +117.1% | +7.4% | +114.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TNA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TNA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TNA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TNA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling