+103.2%
GLD vs TMF
-25.3%
+128.5%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TMF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -0.2% | -0.6% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +4.7% | +1.2% | +3.5% | +4.6% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +19.7% | -20.6% | -2.2% |
| 3M | -4.4% | -2.1% | -2.3% | -4.3% |
| 6M | -13.6% | -13.4% | -0.1% | -12.9% |
| YTD | -6.0% | -16.7% | +10.7% | -5.2% |
| 1Y | +1.8% | -23.3% | +25.1% | +3.1% |
| 3Y | +103.2% | -24.8% | +128.0% | +106.0% |
| All | +103.2% | -25.3% | +128.5% | +106.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TMF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TMF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TMF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TMF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling