+96.6%
GLD vs TFC
+95.2%
+1.4%
-28.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TFC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | -0.7% | -2.1% | -2.8% |
| 7D | -5.5% | +0.1% | -5.6% | -5.5% |
| 30D | -7.0% | +8.6% | -15.7% | -7.2% |
| 3M | -12.4% | -4.3% | -8.0% | -12.3% |
| 6M | -18.0% | +5.4% | -23.5% | -18.2% |
| YTD | -10.5% | +4.5% | -15.0% | -10.7% |
| 1Y | -8.1% | +14.0% | -22.1% | -8.2% |
| All | +96.6% | +95.2% | +1.4% | +86.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TFC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TFC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TFC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TFC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling