+102.3%
GLD vs SONY
+60.0%
+42.3%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SONY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -0.8% | -0.3% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -2.0% | +2.1% | -4.0% | -2.2% |
| 30D | -4.4% | +9.2% | -13.6% | -5.5% |
| 3M | -8.9% | +12.2% | -21.1% | -10.3% |
| 6M | -16.0% | +24.4% | -40.4% | -18.4% |
| YTD | -7.9% | +3.5% | -11.3% | -9.0% |
| 1Y | -3.9% | -9.2% | +5.3% | -4.0% |
| All | +102.3% | +60.0% | +42.3% | +89.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SONY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SONY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SONY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SONY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling