-13.6%
GLD vs PFGC
+13.1%
-26.7%
-18.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -2.0% | +1.2% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +4.7% | +8.5% | -3.8% | +3.6% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +15.0% | -15.9% | -1.9% |
| 3M | -4.4% | -6.2% | +1.8% | -6.7% |
| 6M | -13.6% | +15.7% | -29.3% | -13.9% |
| All | -13.6% | +13.1% | -26.7% | -13.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling