+104.6%
GLD vs NVT
+126.9%
-22.2%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | -1.7% | -1.0% | -2.6% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -13.0% | +15.8% | +3.7% |
| 30D | -4.0% | -32.7% | +28.8% | -1.1% |
| 3M | -8.2% | -30.6% | +22.4% | -5.9% |
| 6M | -14.8% | -33.6% | +18.8% | -12.6% |
| YTD | -6.8% | +11.0% | -17.8% | -7.0% |
| 1Y | -2.4% | +0.8% | -3.2% | -2.3% |
| All | +104.6% | +126.9% | -22.2% | +105.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling