+127.7%
GLD vs MUB
+8.6%
+119.1%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MUB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | 0.0% | -0.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -0.9% | +0.3% | +0.4% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -1.4% | +5.8% | +5.9% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -2.2% | +1.1% | +1.1% |
| 6M | -13.8% | -1.9% | -11.9% | -12.2% |
| YTD | +2.6% | -0.8% | +3.4% | +3.7% |
| 1Y | +24.5% | +2.7% | +21.8% | +22.5% |
| All | +127.7% | +8.6% | +119.1% | +118.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MUB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MUB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MUB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MUB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling