+123.5%
GLD vs MCK
+112.3%
+11.2%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | +0.1% | +0.5% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -2.9% | +0.9% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -1.5% | +0.4% | -1.9% | -1.5% |
| 3M | +3.2% | +12.1% | -8.9% | +3.8% |
| 6M | -16.3% | -5.4% | -10.8% | -16.1% |
| YTD | +0.6% | +7.8% | -7.2% | +1.7% |
| 1Y | +19.1% | +22.9% | -3.8% | +20.6% |
| 3Y | +123.5% | +110.7% | +12.8% | +126.3% |
| All | +123.5% | +112.3% | +11.2% | +126.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling