+103.2%
GLD vs KIM
+57.8%
+45.3%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | KIM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -0.4% | -0.4% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +4.7% | +4.1% | +0.6% | +4.6% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +16.8% | -17.7% | -1.3% |
| 3M | -4.4% | +5.7% | -10.1% | -4.5% |
| 6M | -13.6% | +9.7% | -23.2% | -13.9% |
| YTD | -6.0% | +30.2% | -36.2% | -6.9% |
| 1Y | +1.8% | +32.1% | -30.3% | +0.7% |
| 3Y | +103.2% | +58.6% | +44.6% | +97.7% |
| All | +103.2% | +57.8% | +45.3% | +97.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KIM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KIM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KIM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KIM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling