+127.7%
GLD vs GLW
+400.9%
-273.2%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLW | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | +5.7% | -6.5% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +3.8% | -4.3% | -0.8% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -1.3% | +5.7% | +4.4% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -21.8% | +20.7% | -0.4% |
| 6M | -13.8% | +6.9% | -20.7% | -15.9% |
| YTD | +2.6% | +77.2% | -74.5% | -2.6% |
| 1Y | +24.5% | +123.2% | -98.7% | +17.1% |
| All | +127.7% | +400.9% | -273.2% | +110.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLW.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLW return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLW return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLW wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling