+20.7%
GLD vs FROG
+73.1%
-52.3%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +0.7% | +0.2% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -4.8% | +4.9% | +0.2% |
| 30D | +0.2% | -0.9% | +1.1% | +0.3% |
| 3M | +3.2% | +7.5% | -4.2% | +3.3% |
| 6M | -14.6% | +107.0% | -121.7% | -14.0% |
| YTD | +1.8% | +39.8% | -38.0% | +2.7% |
| 1Y | +20.7% | +74.8% | -54.1% | +21.1% |
| All | +20.7% | +73.1% | -52.3% | +21.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling