+104.8%
GLD vs FGI
+2.3%
+102.5%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FGI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -11.6% | +13.5% | +1.9% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -3.3% | +1.5% | -1.8% |
| 3M | -3.6% | +65.6% | -69.2% | -4.3% |
| 6M | -10.2% | -2.8% | -7.4% | -10.5% |
| YTD | -5.3% | +30.1% | -35.4% | -6.6% |
| 1Y | +2.5% | +50.2% | -47.7% | +0.6% |
| All | +104.8% | +2.3% | +102.5% | +99.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FGI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FGI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FGI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FGI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling