+124.5%
GLD vs DINO
+106.4%
+18.0%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DINO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | +2.8% | -4.5% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +0.7% | +4.2% | -3.4% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +0.3% | +33.9% | -33.6% | +0.3% |
| 3M | +0.6% | +50.5% | -49.9% | +0.4% |
| 6M | -15.6% | +95.2% | -110.7% | -16.4% |
| YTD | +0.9% | +140.6% | -139.7% | -1.1% |
| 1Y | +19.4% | +119.0% | -99.6% | +17.4% |
| 3Y | +124.5% | +100.4% | +24.1% | +119.8% |
| All | +124.5% | +106.4% | +18.0% | +119.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DINO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DINO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DINO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DINO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling