+109.1%
GLD vs DINO
+110.8%
-1.7%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DINO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | +2.7% | -0.8% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +4.9% | -10.7% | +15.6% | +4.8% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -17.8% | +16.4% | -1.5% |
| 3M | -4.8% | +23.3% | -28.1% | -4.9% |
| 6M | -12.5% | +39.6% | -52.1% | -12.7% |
| YTD | -4.2% | +121.6% | -125.8% | -6.1% |
| 1Y | +3.0% | +88.2% | -85.2% | +1.6% |
| 3Y | +109.1% | +114.4% | -5.3% | +105.6% |
| All | +109.1% | +110.8% | -1.7% | +105.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DINO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DINO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DINO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DINO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling