+155.9%
GLD vs CRBG
+117.3%
+38.6%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | CRBG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | +1.4% | -0.8% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -2.0% | +0.6% | -2.5% | -2.0% |
| 30D | -1.5% | +2.6% | -4.2% | -1.6% |
| 3M | +3.2% | +24.0% | -20.8% | +3.0% |
| 6M | -16.3% | +50.5% | -66.8% | -16.4% |
| YTD | +0.6% | +17.1% | -16.5% | +0.2% |
| 1Y | +19.1% | +5.9% | +13.2% | +18.5% |
| 3Y | +123.5% | +122.7% | +0.8% | +122.6% |
| All | +155.9% | +117.3% | +38.6% | +162.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CRBG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CRBG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CRBG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CRBG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling