+103.2%
GLD vs COST
+95.5%
+7.7%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | COST | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -1.1% | +0.3% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +4.7% | +4.1% | +0.6% | +4.7% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +12.0% | -12.9% | -0.9% |
| 3M | -4.4% | +11.2% | -15.6% | -4.5% |
| 6M | -13.6% | +6.1% | -19.7% | -13.5% |
| YTD | -6.0% | +22.9% | -28.9% | -6.7% |
| 1Y | +1.8% | +14.7% | -13.0% | +1.3% |
| 3Y | +103.2% | +92.3% | +10.9% | +106.4% |
| All | +103.2% | +95.5% | +7.7% | +106.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside COST.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus COST return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × COST return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded COST wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling