+2.8%
GLD vs COST
+12.8%
-10.0%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | COST | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | +2.7% | +1.0% | +3.9% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +6.6% | -6.9% | +0.3% |
| 30D | -1.9% | +13.5% | -15.3% | -0.8% |
| 3M | -0.4% | +10.6% | -11.0% | +0.4% |
| 6M | -10.2% | +3.6% | -13.8% | -9.5% |
| YTD | -6.0% | +22.1% | -28.1% | -7.3% |
| 1Y | +2.8% | +11.9% | -9.1% | +0.3% |
| All | +2.8% | +12.8% | -10.0% | +0.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside COST.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus COST return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × COST return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded COST wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling