+142.5%
GLD vs CMS
+23.4%
+119.1%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | CMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -0.2% | -0.7% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +0.4% | -0.9% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -3.6% | +8.0% | +4.9% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -1.9% | +0.8% | -1.0% |
| 6M | -13.8% | -11.0% | -2.8% | -12.3% |
| YTD | +2.6% | +0.2% | +2.4% | +2.3% |
| 1Y | +24.5% | -1.3% | +25.8% | +24.4% |
| 3Y | +125.8% | +35.9% | +89.9% | +113.5% |
| All | +142.5% | +23.4% | +119.1% | +131.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling