+103.2%
GLD vs CFG
+168.6%
-65.4%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CFG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -0.9% | +0.1% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +4.7% | -0.9% | +5.6% | +4.7% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +1.1% | -2.0% | -0.9% |
| 3M | -4.4% | -12.0% | +7.6% | -4.1% |
| 6M | -13.6% | -2.2% | -11.3% | -13.6% |
| YTD | -6.0% | +11.4% | -17.4% | -6.2% |
| 1Y | +1.8% | +27.8% | -26.1% | +1.8% |
| 3Y | +103.2% | +173.3% | -70.1% | +93.3% |
| All | +103.2% | +168.6% | -65.4% | +93.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CFG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CFG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CFG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CFG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling