+122.2%
GLD vs BBIO
+154.7%
-32.5%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -4.7% | +3.0% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -3.4% | -3.9% | +0.5% | -3.3% |
| 30D | -1.1% | -13.4% | +12.2% | -0.7% |
| 3M | +5.8% | +7.6% | -1.7% | +5.6% |
| 6M | -17.1% | -2.4% | -14.6% | -17.0% |
| YTD | 0.0% | -5.2% | +5.2% | -0.1% |
| 1Y | +18.2% | +36.9% | -18.7% | +17.8% |
| All | +122.2% | +154.7% | -32.5% | +118.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling