+102.3%
GLD vs ARWR
+85.8%
+16.5%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARWR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +0.7% | -1.9% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -19.9% | +18.0% | -1.2% |
| 30D | -4.4% | -18.7% | +14.3% | -3.7% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -44.7% | +35.8% | -6.9% |
| 6M | -16.0% | -36.5% | +20.5% | -14.7% |
| YTD | -7.9% | -25.7% | +17.8% | -7.0% |
| 1Y | -3.9% | +18.9% | -22.8% | -4.4% |
| All | +102.3% | +85.8% | +16.5% | +97.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARWR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARWR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARWR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARWR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling