-13.8%
GLD vs ARES
+26.5%
-40.3%
-23.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ARES | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -1.0% | +0.1% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -1.7% | +1.2% | -0.3% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +0.3% | +4.1% | +4.3% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +8.5% | -9.6% | -2.4% |
| 6M | -13.8% | +23.5% | -37.3% | -16.0% |
| All | -13.8% | +26.5% | -40.3% | -16.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARES.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARES return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARES return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARES wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling