-36.4%
GIS vs PLTD
-77.8%
+41.4%
-48.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | +4.6% | -7.1% | -2.6% |
| 7D | -7.8% | +5.9% | -13.8% | -8.0% |
| 30D | +6.6% | -11.6% | +18.2% | +6.9% |
| 3M | +21.0% | -29.9% | +50.9% | +21.6% |
| 6M | -9.1% | -28.5% | +19.5% | -8.9% |
| YTD | -13.6% | -20.4% | +6.8% | -14.0% |
| 1Y | -18.0% | -33.3% | +15.2% | -17.9% |
| All | -36.4% | -77.8% | +41.4% | -36.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling