-40.8%
GIS vs NXT
+178.8%
-219.5%
-59.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | +1.2% | -3.7% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -7.8% | -1.1% | -6.7% | -7.9% |
| 30D | +6.6% | -15.3% | +21.9% | +5.8% |
| 3M | +21.0% | -43.8% | +64.8% | +18.5% |
| 6M | -9.1% | -18.7% | +9.6% | -9.6% |
| YTD | -13.6% | -3.0% | -10.6% | -13.6% |
| 1Y | -18.0% | +22.7% | -40.7% | -17.5% |
| 3Y | -33.7% | +95.9% | -129.6% | -32.8% |
| All | -40.8% | +178.8% | -219.5% | -39.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling