+5.9%
GIS vs NTAP
+57.3%
-51.4%
-23.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | -2.5% | +4.9% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -3.4% | +7.2% | -10.6% | -2.4% |
| 30D | +6.9% | -18.4% | +25.3% | +4.7% |
| 3M | -10.1% | -11.3% | +1.2% | -11.3% |
| 6M | +5.9% | +53.8% | -47.9% | +7.7% |
| All | +5.9% | +57.3% | -51.4% | +7.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling