-32.4%
GIS vs ACGL
+35.2%
-67.5%
-53.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -1.7% | -0.7% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -7.8% | -0.7% | -7.1% | -7.7% |
| 30D | +6.6% | -1.0% | +7.6% | +6.8% |
| 3M | +21.0% | +11.0% | +9.9% | +18.0% |
| 6M | -9.1% | -0.3% | -8.7% | -9.2% |
| YTD | -13.6% | +2.3% | -15.9% | -14.3% |
| 1Y | -18.0% | +6.4% | -24.4% | -19.4% |
| All | -32.4% | +35.2% | -67.5% | -35.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling