+105.9%
GILD vs MDLZ
-2.9%
+108.8%
-26.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MDLZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | 0.0% | -0.7% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -4.8% | +1.9% | -6.7% | -5.3% |
| 30D | +5.8% | +0.4% | +5.4% | +5.6% |
| 3M | +14.9% | -0.6% | +15.6% | +14.8% |
| 6M | -0.4% | +14.7% | -15.1% | -4.4% |
| YTD | +18.5% | +18.0% | +0.6% | +12.7% |
| 1Y | +25.1% | +4.1% | +21.0% | +23.7% |
| 3Y | +105.9% | -4.6% | +110.5% | +104.9% |
| All | +105.9% | -2.9% | +108.8% | +104.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MDLZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MDLZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MDLZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MDLZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling