+387.8%
GH vs XPO
+153.8%
+234.0%
-51.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | XPO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -3.1% | +4.2% | +2.1% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -0.9% | +0.8% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -2.6% | -8.1% | +5.4% | -0.2% |
| 3M | +25.1% | -19.0% | +44.1% | +33.2% |
| 6M | +78.5% | -5.2% | +83.7% | +79.1% |
| YTD | +59.4% | +35.6% | +23.8% | +39.8% |
| 1Y | +173.9% | +41.1% | +132.8% | +135.2% |
| All | +387.8% | +153.8% | +234.0% | +220.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XPO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XPO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XPO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XPO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling