+387.8%
GH vs TRGP
+261.7%
+126.1%
-51.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -1.0% | +2.1% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -0.7% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -2.6% | +9.5% | -12.1% | -5.1% |
| 3M | +25.1% | +10.8% | +14.3% | +20.6% |
| 6M | +78.5% | +25.3% | +53.2% | +63.3% |
| YTD | +59.4% | +60.3% | -0.9% | +31.7% |
| 1Y | +173.9% | +84.6% | +89.3% | +110.5% |
| All | +387.8% | +261.7% | +126.1% | +145.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling