+382.4%
GH vs NXT
+96.6%
+285.8%
-51.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +1.1% | -1.4% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +2.9% | -5.0% | -2.4% |
| 30D | -4.5% | -17.2% | +12.8% | -2.6% |
| 3M | +28.9% | -32.0% | +60.9% | +33.5% |
| 6M | +76.5% | -15.8% | +92.3% | +76.6% |
| YTD | +57.6% | -1.9% | +59.5% | +54.0% |
| 1Y | +167.5% | +22.5% | +145.1% | +149.6% |
| All | +382.4% | +96.6% | +285.8% | +253.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling