+78.5%
GH vs NVS
-11.2%
+89.7%
-16.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NVS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -0.2% | +1.3% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -15.4% | +15.2% | +4.1% |
| 30D | -2.6% | -12.3% | +9.7% | -0.2% |
| 3M | +25.1% | -7.8% | +32.9% | +24.1% |
| 6M | +78.5% | -13.0% | +91.5% | +88.2% |
| All | +78.5% | -11.2% | +89.7% | +88.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling