+376.6%
GH vs NVD
-99.1%
+475.7%
-51.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | +4.5% | -6.8% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -1.2% | +9.0% | -10.3% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -3.7% | -5.5% | +1.8% | -4.0% |
| 3M | +21.7% | -24.6% | +46.3% | +18.6% |
| 6M | +75.7% | -42.1% | +117.8% | +67.9% |
| YTD | +55.7% | -44.3% | +100.0% | +48.8% |
| 1Y | +181.1% | -54.2% | +235.3% | +164.4% |
| All | +376.6% | -99.1% | +475.7% | +193.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling