+73.5%
GH vs NIO
-18.5%
+92.0%
-16.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -1.6% | +1.8% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -13.0% | +13.0% | +1.5% |
| 30D | -1.1% | -18.3% | +17.2% | +1.1% |
| 3M | +21.3% | -33.2% | +54.5% | +26.0% |
| 6M | +73.5% | -21.5% | +95.0% | +69.2% |
| All | +73.5% | -18.5% | +92.0% | +69.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling