+177.1%
GH vs LNT
+8.4%
+168.6%
-33.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | 0.0% | -1.1% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -1.0% | -1.5% | -2.5% |
| 30D | -4.7% | -4.2% | -0.4% | -4.7% |
| 3M | +20.2% | -6.7% | +26.9% | +19.9% |
| 6M | +78.8% | -3.6% | +82.4% | +77.9% |
| YTD | +54.1% | +5.9% | +48.2% | +50.8% |
| 1Y | +177.1% | +7.3% | +169.8% | +179.4% |
| All | +177.1% | +8.4% | +168.6% | +179.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling