+58.6%
GH vs LDOS
-29.6%
+88.3%
-33.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | +1.1% | -3.3% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -11.2% | +1.9% | -13.1% | -11.4% |
| 30D | -7.2% | +12.8% | -20.0% | -8.6% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -1.0% | -6.1% | -7.4% |
| 6M | +62.3% | +6.2% | +56.1% | +63.5% |
| YTD | +52.1% | -23.2% | +75.3% | +59.1% |
| 1Y | +58.6% | -29.5% | +88.1% | +75.8% |
| All | +58.6% | -29.6% | +88.3% | +75.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling