+163.1%
GH vs LDOS
-24.0%
+187.1%
-33.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +0.5% | -0.3% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -5.4% | +5.4% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -1.1% | +4.9% | -6.0% | -2.0% |
| 3M | +21.3% | +7.2% | +14.1% | +21.1% |
| 6M | +73.5% | -24.2% | +97.8% | +91.5% |
| YTD | +58.0% | -25.8% | +83.8% | +71.6% |
| 1Y | +163.1% | -24.7% | +187.8% | +198.7% |
| All | +163.1% | -24.0% | +187.1% | +198.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling