+376.6%
GH vs FND
-50.8%
+427.3%
-51.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FND | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -1.5% | -0.8% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -5.1% | +3.8% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -3.7% | -22.5% | +18.9% | +3.1% |
| 3M | +21.7% | -5.0% | +26.7% | +22.4% |
| 6M | +75.7% | -21.5% | +97.3% | +84.8% |
| YTD | +55.7% | -23.0% | +78.7% | +63.3% |
| 1Y | +181.1% | -44.9% | +226.0% | +223.7% |
| All | +376.6% | -50.8% | +427.3% | +432.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FND.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FND return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FND return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FND wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling