+78.5%
GH vs EOSE
-31.4%
+109.9%
-16.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -3.5% | +4.6% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -0.2% | +15.0% | -15.1% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -2.6% | +2.5% | -5.1% | -2.9% |
| 3M | +25.1% | -33.7% | +58.8% | +27.6% |
| 6M | +78.5% | -32.7% | +111.2% | +96.1% |
| All | +78.5% | -31.4% | +109.9% | +96.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling