+387.8%
GH vs EAT
+587.9%
-200.1%
-51.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -3.2% | +4.3% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -6.8% | +6.6% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -2.6% | -5.4% | +2.7% | -1.5% |
| 3M | +25.1% | +42.8% | -17.7% | +11.9% |
| 6M | +78.5% | +56.5% | +22.0% | +53.0% |
| YTD | +59.4% | +50.0% | +9.3% | +38.3% |
| 1Y | +173.9% | +38.3% | +135.6% | +144.6% |
| All | +387.8% | +587.9% | -200.1% | +66.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling