+73.5%
GH vs DECK
-21.9%
+95.4%
-16.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +1.6% | -1.3% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -2.2% | +2.2% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -1.1% | -13.6% | +12.5% | +2.3% |
| 3M | +21.3% | -21.2% | +42.6% | +29.1% |
| 6M | +73.5% | -21.1% | +94.6% | +85.6% |
| All | +73.5% | -21.9% | +95.4% | +85.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling