+177.1%
GH vs AZO
-32.5%
+209.6%
-33.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.2% | -0.9% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -3.6% | +1.1% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -4.7% | -5.6% | +0.9% | -5.0% |
| 3M | +20.2% | -6.6% | +26.9% | +20.1% |
| 6M | +78.8% | -22.5% | +101.3% | +74.8% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -15.2% | +69.3% | +56.0% |
| 1Y | +177.1% | -33.9% | +211.0% | +152.9% |
| All | +177.1% | -32.5% | +209.6% | +152.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling