+387.8%
GH vs AIG
+33.4%
+354.4%
-51.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AIG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +0.5% | +0.6% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -1.4% | +1.3% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -2.6% | -3.3% | +0.7% | -2.2% |
| 3M | +25.1% | +2.2% | +22.9% | +24.4% |
| 6M | +78.5% | -2.1% | +80.6% | +78.4% |
| YTD | +59.4% | -11.2% | +70.6% | +61.6% |
| 1Y | +173.9% | -2.1% | +176.0% | +170.0% |
| All | +387.8% | +33.4% | +354.4% | +323.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AIG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AIG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AIG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AIG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling