+377.4%
GH vs ACM
-19.8%
+397.2%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -0.8% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -2.1% | -0.3% | -1.8% | -2.0% |
| 30D | -4.5% | -12.9% | +8.5% | 0.0% |
| 3M | +28.9% | -6.4% | +35.3% | +30.4% |
| 6M | +76.5% | -29.2% | +105.7% | +102.8% |
| YTD | +57.6% | -29.9% | +87.6% | +80.8% |
| 1Y | +167.5% | -47.3% | +214.8% | +252.1% |
| 3Y | +377.4% | -19.6% | +397.0% | +343.9% |
| All | +377.4% | -19.8% | +397.2% | +343.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling