+11.7%
GGLL vs ZCMD
-99.5%
+111.1%
-40.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -3.7% | +1.4% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -4.8% | -8.0% | +3.2% | -4.6% |
| 30D | -13.7% | -27.9% | +14.2% | -13.2% |
| 3M | -21.9% | -74.6% | +52.7% | -20.8% |
| 6M | +11.7% | -99.5% | +111.1% | +24.5% |
| All | +11.7% | -99.5% | +111.1% | +24.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling