+111.9%
GGLL vs PLTU
+154.0%
-42.1%
-52.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -9.0% | +6.7% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -4.8% | -13.6% | +8.8% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -13.7% | +16.7% | -30.4% | -16.7% |
| 3M | -21.9% | +29.6% | -51.4% | -27.8% |
| 6M | +11.7% | -0.1% | +11.8% | +5.3% |
| YTD | +2.3% | -31.5% | +33.8% | +1.5% |
| 1Y | +76.2% | -19.7% | +95.9% | +66.5% |
| All | +111.9% | +154.0% | -42.1% | +35.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling