-20.0%
GFS vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+80.0%
-59.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.9% | +2.6% | +2.3% | +4.9% |
| 7D | -3.1% | +9.1% | -12.2% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -16.0% | -37.1% | +21.1% | -15.8% |
| 3M | -24.7% | -53.7% | +29.0% | -24.5% |
| 6M | -45.1% | -99.7% | +54.5% | -44.8% |
| YTD | +16.5% | -99.9% | +116.3% | +17.2% |
| 1Y | +19.3% | -99.9% | +119.2% | +20.1% |
| 3Y | -20.0% | -100.0% | +80.0% | -25.6% |
| All | -20.0% | -100.0% | +80.0% | -25.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling