-46.4%
GFS vs PLTD
-31.2%
-15.2%
-59.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -3.2% | +9.4% | +5.8% |
| 7D | -7.8% | +13.7% | -21.6% | -6.5% |
| 30D | -19.7% | +18.4% | -38.1% | -18.1% |
| 3M | -23.1% | -7.5% | -15.7% | -22.5% |
| 6M | -46.4% | -31.3% | -15.1% | -43.8% |
| All | -46.4% | -31.2% | -15.2% | -43.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling