-26.3%
GFS vs NIO
-32.6%
+6.3%
-33.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.9% | -3.0% | -6.8% | -9.6% |
| 7D | -20.7% | -3.6% | -17.1% | -20.2% |
| 30D | -25.2% | -8.0% | -17.2% | -24.9% |
| 3M | -26.3% | -31.2% | +4.9% | -21.1% |
| All | -26.3% | -32.6% | +6.3% | -21.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling