+35.8%
GFS vs NIO
-37.4%
+73.2%
-51.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -1.6% | +3.1% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +1.0% | -13.0% | +14.0% | +3.0% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -18.3% | +9.7% | -6.1% |
| 3M | -46.5% | -33.2% | -13.3% | -43.6% |
| 6M | -4.8% | -21.5% | +16.7% | -1.8% |
| YTD | +29.7% | -25.5% | +55.1% | +34.6% |
| 1Y | +35.8% | -38.0% | +73.8% | +52.9% |
| All | +35.8% | -37.4% | +73.2% | +52.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling