-48.5%
GFS vs MUZ
-30.7%
-17.8%
-59.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | MUZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -9.9% | +16.1% | +3.8% |
| 7D | -7.8% | +45.8% | -53.6% | +3.6% |
| 30D | -19.7% | +99.8% | -119.5% | -1.1% |
| 3M | -23.1% | +12.0% | -35.1% | -15.9% |
| All | -48.5% | -30.7% | -17.8% | -43.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MUZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MUZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MUZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MUZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling