-18.6%
GFS vs MSTZ
-64.6%
+46.0%
-33.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +7.6% | -7.4% | +0.9% |
| 7D | -5.3% | +21.1% | -26.4% | -3.3% |
| 30D | -15.8% | +40.1% | -55.9% | -12.8% |
| 3M | -18.6% | -66.1% | +47.4% | -18.2% |
| All | -18.6% | -64.6% | +46.0% | -18.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling